COVID-19 certainly was a surprise outbreak.
Well, … for some people it was.
It was certainly marketed that way.
But Dr Fauci and a few other people from the top end of town, possibly in the CLUB, were not surprised and, “luckily for us (NOT)”, THEY had planned and catered for such an event, well in advance.
If you have read this far, I will assume that you are familiar with “Event 201” being a live simulation exercise with the objective of preparing public and private leaders for a pandemic response.
From the World Economic Forum’s website:
“Geneva, Switzerland, 15 October 2019 – The Johns Hopkins Centre for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation will host Event 201: a high-level simulation exercise for pandemic preparedness and response, in New York, USA, on Friday 18 October, 08.45 – 12.30 EDT.
The exercise will bring together business, government, security and public health leaders to address a hypothetical global pandemic scenario. It will also feature a live virtual experience from 08.50 – 12.30 EDT to engage stakeholders worldwide and members of the public in a meaningful conversation of difficult high-level policy choices that could arise in the midst of a severe pandemic”.
Ref: https://www.weforum.org/press/2019/10/live-simulation-exercise-to-prepare-public-and-private-leaders-for-pandemic-response/
What an unbelievable coincidence that these (unelected) world leaders would have such incredible foresight, and, just like whoever ordered that mortuary truck used in Tasmania after the “Port Arthur Massacre”, the world was ready and prepared for the “event” well before it happened.
Both these events, like many other world-shattering events, are surrounded by a plethora of coincidences that a “conspiracy theorist” might highlight as mathematically improbable/impossible.
One coincidence may be a coincidence, but surely as the “coincidences” multiply, the chances that these coincidences are just coincidences become increasingly mathematically improbable.
Dr. Fauci specifically and adamantly (“there is no question”) advised of a “surprise outbreak” during the time of the incoming newly elected USA Federal administration and the timing of Bill Gate’s Event 201 may flag the attention of “conspiracy theorists” and/or serious investigators.
The coincidences of required events, recognised by some early in the game, but certainly more obvious after a big “event” has transpired, frequently defy mathematical logic.
Events related to 911 on the day and days, weeks, months and even years before are overwhelming.
There is plenty of data on “Lucky Larry” Silverstien and he didn’t get that nickname for no reason.
Google “Silverstein normally ate breakfast at the top of the North Tower every morning, but he missed being there on September 11, 2001, because his wife scheduled a dermatology appointment for him”.
Lucky.
Silverstien outlaid between $14 million and $30 million (doesn’t anybody know?) to secure a $3.2 billion, 99-year lease for the World Trade Centre complex six weeks before the September terrorist attack. The terrorist insurance came in handy paying him, not the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey who owned the buildings, but Larry, $4.5 billion dollars.
Lucky.
Numerous other Lucky things happened that day but a focus of a comment in an interview where he mentions “pulling” the building is of interest.
Google’s pages that appear first on a search have whatever the agenda supports and advises that “Larry Silverstien’s comment about “pulling” World Trade Centre Building 7 (WTC 7) refers to a 2002 PBS documentary interview where he discussed deciding to withdraw firefighters from the burning structure due to safety concerns, which conspiracy theorists frequently misinterpret as an order to demolish the building”.
Got it.
Larry was thinking about the safety of the firefighters and was referring to “pulling” them out of the building.
But the firefighters were already outside of the building because there was no water supply, just like Lahaina during the 2023 Hawaii wildfires.
Unlucky
Google also advises “In demolition, “pull it” means using heavy machinery or cables to physically pull down a structure or a specific part of a building”.
So, in demolition the terms to “pull” a building means to “physically pull down a structure or a specific part of a building”, not pull firefighters out of a burning building.
What did Larry actually say?
What did Larry actually mean?
In this 2002 PBS documentary interview, you will hear (through the mood music) “Lucky Larry” Silverstien say,
“not going to be able to contain the fire,
???? terrible loss of life,
??? pull it,
and they made that decision to pull,
the building collapsed”.
The Fire Chief denied talking with Lucky Larry on that day, so who is the “they” Larry says made the decision to “pull” the building?
ie. who made the decision to “physically pull down” the “structure”?
But to “pull” a building, being “to physically pull down a structure or a specific part of a building” is an orchestrated and controlled demolition. To “pull” a building the size of building 7 in a safe procedure requires explosives, strategically placed with a clear plan for demolition which takes weeks if not months of planning to calculate where to place the explosives and when to detonate those explosives in a sequence that has the building fall into the smallest and safest footprint possible. Building 7, as did towers 1 and 2 fell at almost free fall speed into their own footprint.
Lucky
Firemen, eyewitnesses and even live to air coverage advised of explosions occurring within the building at the time the “buildings failed”.
There is an increasing amount of debunking of the thermite/nano thermite allegedly found at the site after the event. Sadly, the site was cleaned up very quickly with 1.8 million tons of structural steel sold as scrap and recycled to Chinese and Indian second-hand metal markets.The site was cleaned up quickly just like the site where Charlie Kirk was assassinated.
But to transport and rig up the necessary explosives required to “pull” a such sizable buildings would require access and surely the building security would notice.
The number of explosives required, and the time needed to rig explosives into buildings the size of the buildings that fell on 911 is significant and requires expertise and coordination.
If this had happened, the extensive security/24-hour surveillance in these buildings would have to be severely compromised which would surely be highly unlikely.
The president’s brother Marvin Bush was the director of Stratesec (1993-2000) the company that provided security for the World Trade centre.
George H W Bush’s cousin, Wirt Walker 111, was the CEO and chairman of Stratesec.
Google advises “The firm (Stratesec) provided electronic security systems and services for commercial and government facilities, including the World Trade Center complex in New York, Dulles International Airport, and United Airlines”.
“Independent investigations and mainstream reports established that Stratesec’s security work at the World Trade Centre ended prior to the 2001 attacks, and Marvin Bush had left the board of the company in the year 2000”.
“Neither Marvin Bush nor Wirt Walker were ever implicated by any official investigation or credible evidence in having any foreknowledge or involvement in the events of 9/11”.
So, nothing to see here.
The fate of the Salomon Brothers Building, referred to as Building 7, which wasn’t hit by a plane and fell at freefall speed and recorded on camera after having its fate reported live on British TV whilst it was still standing in the background almost half an hour before it fell.
That’s the epitome of reporting news accurately before it happens.
The serious investigation into the “event”, being “The 9/11 Commission Report” ”, which didn’t even mention the collapse of Building 7, (how about that for attention to detail), is now revised and titled, “Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States” and gives reason as to why Building 7 fell.
You can chase that up if so interested.
Finding an original video of BBC ‘s news reporter Jane Standley online doing her report live that Building 7 had collapsed whilst still standing in the background is now not as readily available with a google search.
Google presents information not so useful to “conspiracy theorists”.
Even Jane Standley’s news group advised that they had “lost the footage” but many “conspiracy theorists” have copies so it’s not like it has been lost completely,
Here is a youtube upload if you haven’t seen it.
Ref: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=toEXg1sgkAE
Luckily footage of historic events that have occurred more recently have been recorded by hundreds, even thousands or perhaps hundreds of thousands of people worldwide thanks to easily accessible modern technology. Should the Prime Minister of a country deny that he fell off a stage at a specific event when live video footage clearly shows that he did, or a Politician say that he/she never supported or advocated for a policy when archival footage clearly shows is untrue, a normal person may well consider if other claimed information is reliable.
It’s not like the fate of the recordings and telemetry data from the Apollo missions of the mid to late 1960’s that was recorded, stored and subsequently lost by the same people.
I mean, what adventurous (and well educated) men wouldn’t articulate the same sentiment as Astronaut Don Pettit who said,
“I’d go to the moon in a nanosecond. The problem is we don’t have the technology to do that anymore. We used to, but we destroyed that technology and it’s a painful process to build it back again.
Did NASA really destroy the technology required to go to the moon, information that was extant well over half a century ago?
Google advises that, “NASA did not lose the footage because it was a documentary; rather, the original, high-quality backup tapes were accidentally erased and recorded over during a magnetic tape shortage in the early 1980s”.
See, not lost.
Not lost at all.
Not destroyed.
Apparently, the videos were accidentally erased during a magnetic tape shortage in the early 1980s.
NASA’s budget for 2026 was $24.44 billion but only $3.995 billion dollars in 1969. That amount adjusted for inflation was $42.8 billion, so NASA in 1969 essentially had twice the budget. I wonder what they spent all the money on in the years later with Moore’s Law in all technological fields surely data/magnetic tape data storage would not have been an issue. I had a fine collection of video tapes back in the ‘80’s not needing to tape over family history.
But the tape shortage was presumably only one issue because NASA employees must have lacked the skills necessary to catalogue and store the historic collection. Instead, NASA employees “apparently” inadvertently sold them to the public at auction, including one held at Ellington Airforce Base where 1150 old tapes including 3 Apollo recordings were purchased by Gary George a former NASA employee in 1976 for $217.
1976 is only a few years before the “early 1980’s” “magnetic tape shortage”.
Hmmmmmmmm
“On July 20, 2019, exactly fifty years after the historic lunar landing, Sotheby’s auctioned the three videotapes for $1.82 million. What began as a routine government surplus purchase turned into one of the most profitable archival discoveries in modern history”.
“The reels have a combined running time of about two hours and 24 minutes. They cover virtually the entire lunar EVA, including Neil Armstrong’s first steps, Buzz Aldrin’s movements across the lunar surface, the American flag ceremony, scientific activities, sample collection and the astronauts’ conversation with President Richard Nixon”.
Can you believe it?
All this history on those three tapes.
The most important events of the Apollo 11’s mission, misplaced in a collection of over a thousand other videotapes, purchased at an auction at an Air Base by an ex-NASA employee for little more than the cost of just one new video tape and sold at a Space Exploration auction in New York on July 20, 2019, exactly 50 years to the day, after the Apollo moon landing.
Can you believe it?
Can you believe it?
Get your FREE copy of “Savvy Up and Save” here >>>LEARN MORE>>>
Moreton Bay residents can access weekly tips from John on Community Radio 101.5 FM Friday Mornings at 10:10am
John Lynn