“The authorities” would have us get our NEWS, from the experts and not from “conspiracy nuts”.
An approved sourced like the MSM (Main Strean Media) who are unbiased and independent should supply an accurate unscripted account of important events.
Of course, the MSM in each country are owned and controlled by the same international corporations/people, so we get the same story, even the same interview or the same video footage from what most people consider independent NEWS sources.
Propaganda, public relations, News appears to be different names for the same rhetoric. Check out Operation Mockingbird, and see clear control of media here: https://www.facebook.com/reel/3517655195138494
Let me introduce a quote from an inside player more than 50 years ago. “Shortly, the public will be unable to reason or think for themselves. They’ll only be able to parrot the information they’ve been given on the previous night’s news.” -Zbigniew Brzezinski in 1972
Let us bypass the sanctioned MSM and do the opposite to what the “authorities” would direct you to do and look at reports from people, “on the ground” with reports and video that “challenges” the MSB media rhetoric and the narrative that the majority of the population will “parrot”.
Hawaii State Government Attempts Information Blackout On Maui Fire – Refuses Media Access https://www.zerohedge.com/political/hawaii-state-government-attempts-information-blackout-maui-fire-refuses-media-access
Who can you trust?
Those who disobeyed police directions during the fires were the ones who survived being burned to death in their cars.
Somethings afoot. https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/4166222-maui-residents-who-disobeyed-barricade-survived-fires-ap-reports/ and this “Hugely Damning Evidence Corrupt Maui Police Forcibly Blockaded People To Die, Road Block Compilation, https://www.bitchute.com/video/qoPPFVVgE7PT/. , but then, can you blame them, they were just following orders?
Let’s remember Franklin D. Roosevelt’s political quote, “In Politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way”. Manipulating information to benefit a political narrative is one thing, but would authorities preplan such destructive events on their own people? People’s homes were destroyed on Maui. People were burned to death in them. Is the caliber of the callous evil required to facilitate such events extant in the halls of power? Would those in autonomous positions know of and conceal critical information that would have otherwise benefitted those they purport to serve? Australian Comedian Shuan Micallef’s quote from The Guardian’s reporter, Josh Taylor’s Interview on Sat, 16th April 2022, “has the Micallef saying, “Politicians are all borderline sociopaths’ whatever side they are on”. The Left and right side of the “democratic, free world”, have graduates from the Klaus Swab’s WEF (World Economic Forum), so those graduates’ ideologies transcend the political parties. But I digress. Yes, Micallef is a comedian, but this is no laughing matter, and perhaps he pulled his punches on this one. Consider that he may be a punch puller, because politics is fertile ground for psychopaths, (Refer “How many politicians are psychopaths?” https://www.forkingpaths.co/p/how-many-politicians-are-psychopaths ) you may have heard the term “Snakes in Suits”, but sociopaths are much higher on the Machiavellian scale with Narcissism and Psychopathy par for the course. Sociopaths are much more evil than psychopaths. Any politician who withholds information that would benefit their constituents, ie save their homes, livelihoods and mitigate their painful deaths is not a “borderline sociopath”.
Is acted upon Insider Trading activities a level playing field?
Do Loose lips sink sips?
Joe Biden, the president of the United States of America, made the following comment at a press conference regarding homes destroyed in the Maui fire.
“If you fly over these areas that are burned to the ground, you’ll see in the midst of 20 homes that are just totally destroyed, one home sitting there because it had the right roof on it.”
What, … Biden said that?
Yep.
Here is one link with the live quote beside an example of how a focussed laser will heat and burn materials, any material of any colour, … … … except blue.
Ref: https://www.facebook.com/reel/374094605547323 There are a plethora of these clips online with no Bevis and Butthead move to discredit the legitimacy of his words, BUT, there are many attempts to convince his referral to the “right roof” in his address was not referring to the colour blue being on the roof but to structural integrity. 
It does appear that anything blue has the “right roof” on it. The Maui fires that destroyed homes, umbrellas and cars, even melting engine blocks and wheels way above the burning temperatures of nearby combustible fuels but magically leaving trees, even dead and dry ones, unscorched.
Homes, umbrellas and cars all burned up in fervent heat …. …. … …. … except for the those coloured blue.
The houses that had blue roofs were those that uncannily survived the fire. They apparently had the “right roof”. Cars painted blue also had the “right roof” and blue umbrellas within the burn zone also had the “right roof”.
I would wonder what structural design every blue car or umbrella had that protected it from the fire?
Microwave DEW (Directed Energy Weapons) radiation that causes combustion is not absorbed by materials painted blue.
Who has access to these weapons?
Could they have been used in Maui to facilitate a predetermined outcome.
Seeing a pattern, some Chile residents are painting their home’s roof blue for any number of reasons, religious or scientific. The wildfire in Chile, February 2024, had many similarities in characteristics to the Maui fires.
It should be noted that there were homes in both Maui and Chile with other coloured roofs that miraculously survived being burned to the ground. Pockets of survival that are commonly found in any “disaster”.
But those blue cars and blue umbrellas must gave had what Biden refers to as the “right roof”.
Let’s return to the necessary mop-up operations after the Maui “Event”.
One point of view is certainly not suffice in either any science or social circumstance. https://www.facebook.com/watch/?extid=CL-UNK-UNK-UNK-AN_GK0T-GK1C&mibextid=2Rb1fB&v=1314690375807310
So, … a one of $700 payment for each eligible Maui family, and $1350 per night each for the 500 FEMA personnel to help Maui residents, (they are from the government and they are were there to help) and billions to the Ukraine.
The USA appears to be consistent with their policies of metaphorically sending their children to bed hungry whilst they buy new bikes for the neighbour’s kids.
Americans who have paid tax for all their working lives may be able to access social security which is Australia’s equivalent of being on the Old Age Pension.
The social security payment, at the time of writing, is in the order of $1400 per month.
Immigrants however, even illegal immigrants, are rewarded with $2200 per month.
As they say, …. “You can’t make this stuff up”.
But our Australian corporate government doesn’t look after our people either, and maybe, a fire, or referendum can be used to control land otherwise not in the control of corporate Australia.
The Chair of the Prime Minister’s Indigenous Advisory Council, Warren Mundine, speaking on Q&A, August 29, 2016, advised that $30 billion per year is spent on the aboriginal community of an estimated 500 000 people, which is marginally less than was identified in the 2011 Census, but now government statistics suggest a possible 200 000 aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders’ may not have been counted.
A fact checking site prints, “Estimated expenditure per person in 2012-13 was $43,449 for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians”.
Bronwyn Bishop asks where has the money gone when an aboriginal woman with six kids had moved to live on a slab of concrete outside of Alice Springs where she could access dialysis treatment. Where is her $43,449 per year. What does she spend it on?
https://www.tiktok.com/@deanolovinglife3/video/7266933982816652552
Would another thousand dollars, … … say, upping the payment to $44,449 per year make a difference to this mother’s plight?
The money doesn’t appear to be getting to where it is needed regardless of how much is allocated.
Having identified and been morally moved by the predicament, could Bronwyn Bishop be the one to solve the issue of the obvious waste?
Well amongst other costs, she did charter a helicopter from Melbourne to Geelong’s Clifton Springs Golf Club for a party function at a cost of $5227.27 instead of using her taxpayer funded Commonwealth car for the 90-minute trip.
https://www.tiktok.com/@itty_bitty_baby/video/7271872025273076993
Ahhh, …. the hypocrisy. What will the market bear, … ie; what can we get away with?
But money goes missing or is misspent on a daily basis.
Take Australia’s detention centre on Nauru for example.
“In May 2016, Australia held 1,193 people on Nauru at a cost of $45,347 a month per person – about $1,460 a day or $534,000 a year.
By August 2021, the number of asylum seekers and refugees held on the island had fallen nearly tenfold, but the costs of running the offshore program remained broadly static. In that month, there were 107 refugees and asylum seekers on Nauru at a cost to taxpayers of $464,486 a month for each person, or more than $15,000 a day.
The average monthly cost in 2021 is $358,646 for every refugee and asylum seeker held on the island, equal to $4.3m per person each year”.
WHAT ???? ….
“$4.3m per person each year” …. Apparently.
I would personally consider having them stay at my place for half of that and I would provide a clean towel each day and include a light breakfast.
At the time of writing the site is empty. https://www.hrlc.org.au/news/2023/07/25/offshore-cruelty
“As potential corruption revealed, Albanese Government must urgently evacuate the survivors of offshore detention.
The Albanese Government must immediately evacuate the 75 remaining survivors of offshore detention from Papua New Guinea and shut down its detention centres on Nauru, as it accounts for the multi-million-dollar secret payments that have propped up offshore detention over the past decade.
Investigative reports this week have revealed multi-million-dollar payments by government contractors to politicians in Papua New Guinea and Nauru. Reports suggest that these payments were made with the knowledge of the Department of Home Affairs, and even senior government figures in Australia.
It has also been revealed that the former Morrison government entered a secret deal with the Papua New Guinean Government to continue payments to provide for the 75 people left behind in PNG. This came after PNG’s Supreme Court shut down formal regional processing arrangements and the Australian Government claimed to have no ongoing involvement.
Together, these reports reveal the corruption and duplicity at the heart of offshore detention. They also raise serious questions around the Albanese Government’s continued expenditure on regional processing operations in both Nauru and PNG”.
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/may/23/nauru-offshore-detention-immigration-processing-to-cost-australia-485m-22-asylum-seekers
Nauru offshore processing to cost Australian taxpayers $485m despite only 22 asylum seekers remaining.
Home affairs department officials dispute suggestions this year’s cost amounts to $22m a person.
A $6 calculator from a “junk shop” in the right hands can soon end that dispute.
This issue has already been referred to the new “National Anti-Corruption Commission” with the ABC advising on 3 July 2023 that “The National Anti-Corruption Commission commences with a full workload, as people waste no time making referrals”.
It does appear that something is afoot.
Get your FREE copy of “Savvy Up and Save” here >>>LEARN MORE>>>
Moreton Bay residents can access weekly tips from John on Community Radio 101.5 FM Friday Mornings at 10:10am
John Lynn