But corruption is not just about money.

Money is just one of the very effective control mechanisms used by those who rule.
But THEY can print as much money as THEY want, anytime THEY want, and give it to whomever THEY chose justifying it as a fiscal stimulus to help a struggling economy.

Kicking the “can” down the road increasing the impact of the next “recession we had to have”, as coined by Australia’s 1990 Federal Treasurer, Paul Keating, who later became Prime Minister the following year.

Here is another quote from the past if you are unaware of how money is created. “Give me control over a nation’s currency, and I care not who makes its laws. Mayer Amschel Rothschild, founder of the Banking dynasty of the same name (1743–1812)”. If you need an explanation of what he meant by that let me suggest you read, “The Creature from Jekyll Island”.

You don’t just stay on the island you end all over the place, … … … just like this book, … … … including looking into who was on the legendary ship Titanic, like John Astor, which appears to have been swapped out for its sister ship, the Olympic for insurance purposes. There is no end to this stuff.

The focus is not only who was on the ship when it went down, but who should have been on the ship but luckily got off at the last moment.

Some people have all the luck, like earlier mentioned lucky Larry Silverstein, who, although he had a scheduled meeting in one on the WTC buildings on the morning of 9/11, his wife insisted that he attend a medical appointment instead, … … … which must have been scheduled at the same time.

Lucky.

No, it’s not all about getting away with the money.

Other things need to be “got” away with as well and before we leave there is a difference between money and currency, … obviously because they are two different words like speed and velocity. For those unsure of how Fractional Reserve Banking works, may I suggest watching an introductory cartoon on the subject entitled: “The American Dream – Understanding Money and the Banking System”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6zpfE7WjHI

Getting away with the money may not be the only focus, especially when you have access to more than you will ever need.

Australian Senator Heffernan used a Senate estimates committee, “to discuss the list of 28 people, (alleged paedophiles) which he said formed part of police documents that had been “signed off” by Gary Crooke, QC, the former senior counsel assisting NSW’s Wood royal commission into police corruption in the 1990s.”  He said that “Many of the people on the list and otherwise named in the documents were “prominent”, including a former prime minister”.

WHAT?????

Best read that again for clarity.

The Sydney Morning Herald article, written by Jane Lee and updated 21 October 2015 says that Australia’s Senator Heffernan said regarding the documents: “They were delivered to me by a police agency some time ago because no one seems to want to deal with them.”

The article states that “Senator Heffernan had shown the documents to the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse but was told they were not part of its terms of reference.” Further the article advises “[The commissioner] said, ‘We’ve decided not to revisit that issue because the public would lose confidence in the judiciary.”

Ref; https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/liberal-senator-bill-heffernan-says-former-prime-minister-a-suspected-paedophile-20151020-gke2o0.html

If investigating a police document naming alleged paedophiles who were “prominent” people in the Australian community “including a former prime minister”, was investigated, “… … the public would lose confidence in the judiciary”, and it’s not done, is it still OK to have confidence in the judiciary?
… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … …  … … … … … … … … …  thinking
… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … thinking
… … … … … … … … … thinking

Let me take that question on notice.

Vietnam’s Nguyen Thanh Long was not the only one apologetic for wrongdoing.

Big corporations are also sorry, … … … … … … when they get exposed.

Even in the medical fraternity, hereinafter referred to as “The Sickness Industry”, one would expect a little more honesty … … surely?

Let’s have a quick look at the regret of one significant multinational player in the pharmaceutical industry.

We regret certain actions taken in the past, but are proud of the action we’ve taken to strengthen our internal controls,” said Amy Schulman, Pfizer’s general counsel.” That’s back in 2005,
Ref; https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-pfizer-settlement/pfizer-to-pay-1-4-billion-in-fines-idUKTRE58143K20090903/
but they appear to still be sorry, one would assume, because, according to the book, “The All Seeing “I””, page 329, which says “Pfizer has been hit since only the year 2000 with fines totalling at least £7.5 billion. The figure includes £ 331.5 million for kickbacks and bribery offences: £1.1 billion for false claims: and in 2009, a record breaking £1.7 billion for the fraudulent promotion of a painkiller ….”., but not like Vietnam’s ex Health minister Nguyen Thanh Long, … …. no one goes to jail.

The shareholders simple pay the fine and then, … “what’s for dinner”.

Is anyone still keen to line up for a safe and effective Pfizer shot?

Meanwhile, in the good old US of A, Associate Attorney general, Thomas Perrelli, says: “Pfizer has agreed to pay $2.3 billion, the largest healthcare fraud settlement in the history of the Department of Justice. Within that $2.3 billion is a criminal fine of $1.195 billion, which makes it the largest criminal fine in history.” Refuting that it wasn’t Covid 19 related here: https://fullfact.org/online/pfizer-fine-2-billion-vaccine/  the information regarding the incidents, (more than one), is supported by more than 3,150, 000 other sites located by my search engine in 0.27 seconds , like this; Office of Public Affairs | Associate Attorney General Tom Perrelli at Pfizer Settlement Press Conference | United States Department of Justice

Yes, the “largest criminal fine in history” settled with a fine paid by the shareholders.
Not 18 years, 18 minutes or even 18 seconds in jail for anyone.

The fine is merely one of the costs of doing business.

According to The Australian, (Newspaper) Philanthropist, Bill Gates says he regrets, ie. he is sorry, that he had dinners with convicted sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein

Ref; https://www.theaustralian.com.au/life/bill-gates-admits-he-regrets-having-dinners-with-jeffrey-epstein/video/4b74c410357e326313ec24eb582c8de3 but apparently not sorry yet for having travelled on the “Lolita Express” to Epstein’s Island, at least once in 2013 Ref: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7350469/Bill-Gates-flew-Jeffrey-Epstein-Loliota-Express-2013-years-pedophile-prison-stay.html and that was four years after Epstein was a registered sex offender.

Other high-profile people like Bill Clinton, Joe Doe 46, John Doe 36 and Prince Andrew have apparently been entangled with Epstein with, … … … maybe no wrongdoing.

But, pick any day of any year, like today, as I type at my desk, 26 April 2024, and know that this day, The Guardian newspaper printed an article entitled, “No one is above the law”: police data reveals sexual assault among charges laid against 78 Victorian officers.”

Ref: https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2024/apr/26/victoria-police-criminal-charges-sexual-assault

The movie character, Billy Jack said in 1971, “When policemen break the law, then there isn’t any law.

The Guardian printed that, “68 police officers and five public transport police facing criminal charges”.The group includes 26 leading senior constables, 20 senior constables, 14 sergeants, seven first constables, five senior sergeants and one ranked inspector or above.”

“Of the 78 members currently facing charges, 15 have been suspended with pay”, and that, “They are waiting for a court hearing or for their case to be finalised, which can take years.”
How many years?

These are criminal charges including sexual assault by senior police officers.

When policemen break the law, then there isn’t any law.

Justice delayed is justice denied” is an appropriate legal maxim.

But not all these charged, ie alledged offenders can sit at home and watch sitcoms on full pay for who knows how many years. The Guardian advises that 13 (were) suspended without pay” and that another, “16 (were) transferred to other duties”, and that, “The remaining 34 have no interim action against them.”

… … … … OK … …

Has anyone lost confidence in the judicial system, the pharmaceutical/sickness industry, the political system, the constabulary, CEOs of major corporations or any member of any Royal Family?    … … …  me neither.

Get your FREE copy of “Savvy Up and Save” here >>>LEARN MORE>>>
Moreton Bay residents can access weekly tips from John on Community Radio 101.5 FM Friday Mornings at 10:10am
John Lynn